[Eddie]

That was me and Bob back then but I actually never did anything, i didn't even delete one post I think

[Adam]

what size boots does uglybob take?

[Bridgie]

still no explanation then, thats my bet down the pan, sidlas looking good for the sweepstake now

[Sidders]

Bob never comes online until 6.

[kendra k]

it's now 6... do we start the polls. i'm not convinced it's entirely bob, though he loves being a pariah.

[Sidders]

He's going to deny it, even though it's so obvious it's him.

[kendra k]

which is why he can't delete this thread now. what a sticky situation.

[Sidders]

I'd noticed that.

[Uglybob]

believe what you will, im doing the review

[kendra k]

bob, we know you're a reviewer and take your job seriously as such, but that's not in question now. people want to know whether or not you have been acting as moderator recently, and whether or not you are responsible for the missing posts. it's that simple. are you the moderator?

[Uglybob]

as sidla says "of course hes going to deny it", im in a no win situation.

[kendra k]

if you honestly did not do it, you can vindicate yourself mr keightley. are you "the moderator?" did you delete the missing posts? do you know who did? you know the answer to these questions, and i'm sure the rest of us can jump to conclusions, but would most likely prefer the truth and not hearsay. did you do it?

[Sidders]

You may as well just admit it then.

[Uglybob]

"am i the moderator"

Answer - No

[kendra k]

had you any hand in the removal of the posts in question?

[Uglybob]

the only thing i asked was for the war topic to be moved to private

[Sidders]

Bob, explain away all the evidence to suggest that you are moderator.

I can't prove anything, but I'm 99% certain that it is you.

As Lloyd Grossman would say: Lets look at the evidence.

My thread entitled "Star Trek Nemesis" is deleted. It was originally posted at about 17:00 and remained there for over an hour. At around 18:15 it was deleted shortly after you came online. I then complain about it being deleted and repost it. This time it isn't deleted but within the thread you make remarks such as:

im not a geek hence i avoid Star Trek at every opportunity

and

Star Trek is for dullards who get excited with women in ill fitting lycra.

Coincidence? I doubt it.

Then there's the issue of Hoare's posts being deleted. Jealous that he'd overtaken your post count in ridiculous posting sprees, you decide to remove 100 posts of him talking rubbish. This means that you're back on top.

Explain.

And it's going to have to be a very convincing answer for me to believe you.

And further to that, I don't care if you are moderator. I'd rather you just admitted it then this whole thing could be over.

[Uglybob]

In defence your honour

Star Trek is for dullards, i was posting a message. It isnt a coincidence if you write a message.
As for being jealous of that eejit, thats like being jealous of a man with leprosy.

[Sidders]

It is coinsidence if the post is deleted shortly after you came online, especially if that is your opinion of Star Trek.

[kendra k]

then why was the first star trek post deleted? it's not like there aren't other threads discussing films that aren't exactly moyles related.

and attacking jonny won't make it easier. this really has nothing to do with him now.

[Bridgie]

bob you did keep disappearing when my man utd post was deleted then deleted again and the moderator wouldnt reply with the reason why

[kendra k]

what man u post?

[Sidders]

And then there's the other matter of this thread being locked. Could it be that Harris doesn't want the truth to come out?

[Chief Erf]

Ok i admit it was me, i sh a g g ed johnny

[kendra k]

jonny had at least one other thread asking where the posts went, but it was deleted.
bob, do you know anything about this?
harris, what is there to cover up?